Ifremer has been monitoring coastal waters from space for many years using SST, chlorophyll and turbidity levels derived from satellite observations, as a contribution to several European environmental monitoring frameworks. We are in particular committed to provide rapid alert in case of eutrophication or HAB (Harmful Algal Bloom) occurring in areas under our responsability. The exceptional bloom of karenia mikimotoi that took place in July 2010 in the Channel is such an example of an early detection which emphasizes the benefit of using satellite observation as a support to coastal environment monitoring.
By Francis Gohin (1), Jane Cutting (2), and Claude Le Bec (3)
(1) Ifremer DYNECO, Centre de Brest, 29280 Plouzane, Brittany, France. Francis.Gohin@ifremer.fr
(2) States of Guernsey Government, Health and Social Services Department, Environmental Health and Pollution Regulation Unit, Longue Rue, St Martin's, Guernsey.
(3) Ifremer-Cresco, 38, rue du Port Blanc, BP80108, 35801 Dinard Cedex, Brittany, France. Claude.le.Bec@ifremer.fr
Karenia mikimotoi is a dinoflagellate common in the Eastern North Atlantic Ocean, particularly in summer. Recent K. mikimotoi blooms in Western Ireland (Silke et al., 2005), Scottish waters (Davidson et al., 2006), English Channel (Vanhoutte-Brunier et al., 2008) have been reported and described. This dinoflagellate is feared as it may impact the marine animal population directly, through its haemolitic cytotoxin, or indirectly through hypoxia during the degradation of the bloom when its biomass is high. In 2003, a major K. mikimotoi bloom, visible from space, occurred from the end of June to the beginning of August offshore in the Western English Channel. The bloom started between Northern Brittany and Cornwall. It then developed eastward as the thermal stratification set up and favoured its habitat, progressing easterly with the season. Despite the considerable cell concentration level, the damages were limited as the bloom was mainly offshore. No apparent damage was reported in the Channel Islands and only some dead fish and visible stress in the growth of some shellfish species, for instance Pecten maximus, were reported.
Some K. mikimotoi blooms are at too great a depth, or are not large enough to be visible from space. However, some reach such an extent and have a sufficiently high concentration of pigment and particles in the surface waters that they can be observed by space-borne Ocean Colour sensors as SeaWiFS, MODIS/AQUA a,d MERIS. At this size and density of bloom it may also be possible in some conditions to discriminate K.mikimotoi from other species (Miller et al., 2006).
Observation of the K. mikimotoi bloom and alert
The surveillance through the MarCoast2 project
Ifremer has been monitoring coastal waters from space for many years using SST, chlorophyll and turbidity levels derived from satellite observations. Satellite data are provided thanks to the Ocean Colour TAC (Thematic Assembly Centre) of MyOcean. MyOcean is funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Program. This project aims to provide and evaluate the marine reference observations needed to fulfil the requirements of the GMES program (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security). The monitoring, the analysis, and the delivering of the satellite information through a WEB-server dedicated to coastal seas is managed by the MarCoast2 project. MarCoast2, a successor to the ROSES and MarCoast projects, is a GMES Service Element funded by ESA (European Space Agency) and is aimed at supporting and developing exchanges between European coastal seas satellite-data providers and users of that information. At Ifremer, there are two main applications for the information handled by MarCoast2. The first addresses long term surveillance requirements (for the Water Framework Directive and the European Maritime Strategy) and the second provides rapid alert in case of eutrophication or HAB (Harmful Algal Bloom). This second task is also linked with Previmer, the French coastal oceanography project, for Ifremer.
HABs in the coastal waters around France are seldom visible from space, due to their low cell concentration or deep location (dynophysis for instance). We can also mention pseudo-nitzschia, a diatom able to bloom in high concentration with very variable toxicity (producing domoic acid, an amnesic neurotoxin) depending on the species and the level of stress eventually caused by the environmental conditions.
The case of K. Mikimotoi in the English Channel is different as it may occur in high concentration over large areas, as in the western English Channel.
Observation of the K. mikimotoi bloom in July 2010 and the early alert
The bloom was clearly visible on the merged MERIS and MODIS chlorophyll map (MyOcean L4 product for the IBI-ROOS area) on July 15th (Figure1). Its appearance at a time when production generally decreases offshore following the consumption of nutrients in spring.is a major event in the coastal seas of the western European waters
Figure 1 shows the bloom in the background of the phytoplankton concentration in European waters, but as the merged L4 product is obtained by a space-time interpolation, it is recommended to use the daily Meris and Modis images from the CERSAT/MarCoast server to track this bloom.
Figure 2 shows the evolution of the bloom from July 15th to July 29th. We observe an apparent easterly drift of the bloom until July 26th. Although this drift seems to follow the mean residual current in the Channel, the cause of this evolution could actually be due to the progressive establishment of favourable conditions for the growth of dinoflagellates in the east of the area. The thermal stratification (See Figure 3) appears in the western English Channel and establishes progressively eastwards through the season. This stratification results from solar irradiance and increased air temperature. High solar irradiance, providing more light and energy for photosynthesis at the pycnocline level, will also enhance the growth of the bloom. However, there is a part of the bloom which is not dependent on stratification and is more directly related to local transport as shown by the tongue visible south of Guernsey on the image of July 18th. After July 21st, the sea surface temperature, under a covered sky, began to be lower than the seasonal mean. Few images are available during the period 22-26 of July. They show a scattered bloom, clearly decaying and recentering on the small area shown on the Modis image of July 29th.
Figure2: Evolution of the bloom from July 15th to July 26th observed by Meris and Modis
images extracted from the Ifremer/MarCoast server : http://www.ifremer.fr/nausicaa/marcoast/index.htm
The action after the alert from MarCoast and the analyses of CEFAS
Following a high turbidity event in spring 2008, (attributed to two successive strong storms in December 2007 and March 2008) visible from space, four people from the Channel Islands registered on the MarCoast server (750 registered people from Western Europe at the end of July 2010). On July 19th they were informed by email that a phytoplankton bloom, possibly composed of K. mikimotoi was approaching Guernsey. The information reached the Fisheries Department of the States of Guernsey Government who informed the Environmental Health and Pollution Regulation Unit. Officers collected two samples in the surface waters, seven miles west of Guernsey on July 22th. These samples were sent to CEFAS Plankton Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk, for analysis. Results, known the 27th, showed 934000 and 1380000 cells of K. mikimotoi, 24200 and 9200 cells of pseudo-nitzschia, and 200 cells of dinophysis in one of the samples. The presence of dinophysis in quantity greater than 100 cells/litre requires additional flesh and water samples from the contaminated site.
Is there a scenario for the fate of the bloom in the next weeks?
As a bloom of K. mikimotoi bloom could have been anticipated given the very similar environmental conditions to those prevailing in 2003, it is worth re-examining the evolution of the 2003 bloom observed from SeaWiFs and Modis and considering the climatic conditions during both years. High air temperature and solar irradiance were common characteristics in the 2003 and 2010 months of July. Figure 4 shows the surface temperature at Marel Iroise (near Brest) for the monitoring year leading up to July 2010 and the corresponding temperatures in 2003. The black curve is the mean for the 2000-2010 period, the dashed lines are the 10 and 90 percentiles. Although the variability and the seasonal amplitude of the temperature at this station is lower than on the western Channel, it shows that both winters were relatively cold (2010 is the coldest measured, reaching the percentile 10) and that the months of July were relatively warm for both years. This could have favoured the stratification of the surface waters.
Figure 4 : Sea surface Temperature at the Marel Iroise buoy (Sainte-Anne du Portzic)
The solar irradiance is also available from satellite data (METEOSAT) and it could contribute useful information although its variations are quite similar to those of the temperature in summer. We could refer to the model proposed by Vanhoutte-Brunier et al. (2008) to fully use this information in future.
Figure 5 : Evolution of the 2003 bloom (SeaWiFs and Modis). Chlorophyll concentration derived from fluorescence measured from onboard a ferry (Courtesy of the Southampton Oceanography Centre) are also shown on the 07/10-11 image.
Without running now the K. mikimotoi ecological model using weather forecast, we may refer to the evolution of the 2003 bloom to imagine possible evolution for the 2010 bloom. The images at Figure 5 show several chlorophyll concentrations maps observed from July 10th to August 3rd 2003. After July 22nd the bloom progressed easterly in several days, giving the unusual feature of August 3rd characterised by high chlorophyll concentration at a place (north-west of Normandy) where it seldom occurs at such a level. We know from a CEFAS cruise of July 2003 (Vanhoutte-Brunier et al., 2008) that the bloom was initially dominated by K. mikimotoi. Was is still the case at the end of July and in August? What we know is that K. mikimotoi was still present in the first half of August as it was observed from water samples collected by the Ifremer Station of Dinard north-east of the Baie de Saint-Brieuc, and that after that fishermen reported dead fish at the surface of the water.
The weather forecast for the beginning of August 2010 is not favourable regarding the development of the bloom which may continue its decay. However it could maybe start again to extend eastwards and southwards in case of exceptionally sunny weather later in the month.
Davidson K., Miller, P., Wilding, T. Shutler J., Bresnan E., Kennington K., and S. Swan, 2009. A large and prolonged bloom of karenia mikimotoi in Scottish waters in 2006. Harmful Algae, 8, 349-361.
Miller, P.I., Shutler, J.D, Moore, G.F., and S.B. Groom, 2006. SeaWiFS discrimination of harmful algal bloom evolution. Int. J. Remote Sensing 27, 2287-2301.
Silke, J., O'Beirn, F., and M. Cronin, 2005. Karenia : an exceptional dinoflagellate bloom in western Irish waters, summer 2005. Marine Environment and health Series 21, Marine Institute, Galway, Ireland. Available on line at www.marine.ie
Vanhoutte-Brunier, A., Fernand, L., Ménesguen, A., Lyons, S., Gohin, F., and P. Cugier, 2008. Modelling the Karenia mikimotoi bloom that occurred in the western English Channel during summer 2003,. Ecological Modelling 210, 351-376.